Transform Your heirs property with heirsproperty.net
SEGREGATION ACTIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY
Why was Allen Ray Haynes treated so illegally? How can this be allowed in this era? This was one of his business websites! He had GET FREE BAILBONDING, HAYNES STUMP GRINDING AND CAR SALES.
(CASE # 33:18 CR-40 CM-1 AND CASE #33:18-40-CM-4 KIDNAPPING AND CONSPIRACY
CASE # 33: 18 CR-40 CM-2 1152 -BATTERY)
About undue injustice
Allen Ray Haynes by Jessica Moore
Synopsis by Jessica Moore- independent reporter: Defense Lawyer was a charlatan in all of his techniques of defense. Simply, he as in the segregation era just did not defend Mr. Allen Ray Haynes because he knew the objective of the prosecution and the JUDGE-The need to take this “uppity Black man down!
Synopsis by Lillie Killingworth: 2 Timothy 1:7 and Ecclesiastes 3:16–17
Vilification (to utter slanderous and abusive lying statements against) done to Allen Ray Haynes.
Three and a half years ago, Allen Ray Haynes was widely seen as the stoic, highly motivated and highly respectable well known small-town biggest businessman LLC owner and high tax payor at early age. Then after 42 years as a businessman with a spotless reputation, he became something else due to disregard of civil rights, legal occupation, legal exculpatory cell phone video of bail bond fee altercation with illegal request to pay bail bond fee with illegality.
Now, this businessman is imprisoned through the usage of segregation railroad style of illegal justice in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi. A setup repeat offender accuser- since at an early age, had been in and out of jail or prison but had made an affidavit of denial of charges before and after the trial. a bail bond agency owner and professional bail/enforcement agent, he and honesty, integrity and ethical legal knowledgeable people were at complete odds with the no viable evidence of the charges of kidnapping, sexual battery, and attempted murder and all were reportedly blindsided EVEN WITH an incompetent defense attorney and was imprisoned. Amid it all, the rumor mill has been quite busy, with Allen Ray Haynes-a well-known heterosexual person linked to denial revenge of an LGBTQ individual and jealous out of wedlock adult children; but it is legally questionable that even his appeal was denied on hearsay and conjecture that was outlawed after segregation. Court filings on Allen Ray Haynes’ daddy and rumors of the vengeful actions of these individuals that is well connected to officials on a guilty of charges on Allen Ray Haynes is worth the legal questions and answers from the sheriff, the prosecutors, the JUDGE and the assistant attorney general..
- Since Allen Ray Haynes was 38 years old, he was said to be radical, show of superiority. Negativity to bow down to anyone, would not ever do what someone wanted him to do and just a character that was very different from other small town Black men This type of character made racist Whites very angry in that small Mississippi town. Many Blacks was just extremely jealous of him being a successful businessman for so many years in Prentiss, Mississippi. He suffered for many years from false accusations.
- He was a mentor. He took it very seriously because of the high percentage of Blacks compared to Whites being jailed! He overstepped one time with a young black man that had been in and out of jail from early childhood. That gave officials and other racist a chance for “racial profiling” and to use abuse of power, malfeasance, and conspiracy to imprison a person that they have a sincere penchant or proclivity to demean or do harm by any means possible to humiliate and oppress Allen Ray Haynes.
- Even though there was no criminal case, they made one out of an altercation with this early childhood convict that Mr. Allen Ray Haynes’ bail bond agency bailed out of jail. This early-aged convict (Ross) made the only civil rights decision that he had and selected and called Mr. Allen Ray Haynes’ bail bond agency to bail him out of jail. As legally required by the Court of Mississippi for its surety to keep a defendant until trial and that was always the agency’s goal. Ross chose to put himself in the custody/responsibility for the court of Mississippi to Mr. Allen Ray Haynes’ bail bonding agency until trial. This defendant lied and said that the bail bond fee would be given at the jail but it was not and he did what he was so highly rumored to pander, pimp or prostitute or to beat people out of money- thus beat the bail bond agency out of the bail bond fee money by stupidly requesting to gyrate for the bail bond fee.
- Ross life was-Mr. Allen Ray Haynes thought-very much in the need for correction. We must remember that Mr. Haynes’ bail bond agency never put anyone back in jail because they failed to pay bail bond fee. If the professional agent of soliciting agent after exerting all efforts with no positive results, Mr. Haynes had a collection agency that collected that bail bond fee before his or her trial date. So, why make an illegal request? He did not know or was unaware of the wrong for doing this type of request.
- Having a mentor mentality, Mr. Haynes quickly and with none integrity punished Ross by allowing him to carry out his request and allowing him to realize that his actions were unwarranted and not needed because it did not produce the 10% bail bond fee and he was not going to allow him to beat him out of his money.
- That was the altercation. Mr. Allen Ray Haynes cell phone videoed all of his actions with a defendant so that there are no misinterpretations or lies of physical abuse. This altercation was not different. It was videotaped. He did not touch Ross or tie him up or hold a gun on him. roIt was videotaped that he used severe profanity in letting Ross know that he must pay the bail bond fee - not make illegal requests. Now, Ross is termed a gaol-bird-early age convict he was very obedient and did not know to be. Where was the crime because it was not shown, and the entire altercation and I mean the entire altercation was videotaped.
- These corrupt officials made exculpatory evidence (not guilty) into inculpatory evidence (speculation guilty) to make a case and get a speculation guilty verdict. That was a backdoor process never to be used in the integration era. They showed biases, partial justice, prejudice toward Mr. Haynes with many violations of the justice constitution laws: none speedy trial, no in legal time or even the legal issue of warrant for cell phone video, none definition for charges, lies of forensic evidence, hit in the face with a gun and show no signs and many other violations of the law!
- The assistant attorney general joined in the injustice with hearsay-that was banned after segregation- and conjectures denied the appeal. (Please read her brief) one statement that I knew was lying hearsay: “he handcuffed him at the house!” there was no place at the business home office that handcuffs could have been used on the structure. There were many more hearsay statements or conjectures that were very untrue and could not have been possible. After all, Ross was in the bail bond agency’s custody/responsibility. IT IS AN PROVEN LEGAL FACT THAT ALLEN RAY HAYHES DID NOT TOUCH ROSS THE RECANTED ACCUSER!
- See/hear this video below yourself: ONLY DEMANDING .BAIL BOND FEE WITH PROFANITY Also Ross (the accuser’s recant before trial and after IN PICTURES BELOW AND IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED AND FILED.
- 21st century of a seemingly racist judge, prosecutor and rumored judass kiss sheriff and racist supporters.
ALLEN RAY HAYNES
THE JUDGE by Lillie Killingsworth
JUDGE made bias STATEMENTS LIKE: “YES, HE IS GUILTY BECAUSE HE DID NOT TAKE THE ACCUSER BACK TO JAIL! NOTE: LEGAL FACT IS THAT A PROESSIONAL BAIL BOND AGENT DOES NOT HAVE TO TAKE A DEFENDANT BACK TO JAIL BECAUSE AS SURETY FOR THE COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AND LEGALLY KNOWING THAT THE COURT ONLY WANT THE DEFENDANT TO SHOW UP ON COURT DATE! THERE IS NO RULES OR REGULATI ONS FROM THE STATE THAT REQUIRES A BAIL BOND AGENCY TO PUT A BAIL OUT DEFENDANT BACK IN JAIL. THAT IS AT THE WISH/DESIRE OF THE BAIL BOND AGENCY. HE MYSTERIOUSLY PLAYED THE EXCULPATORY CELL PHONE VIDEO FOR ENTIRE COURT INSTEAD OF ONLY JURY-IT COULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AS A VULGAR, PROSTITUTION CRIME ETC. GYRATION FOR MONEY (BAIL BOND FEE) LEADS TO PROSTITUTION AND THEN HE ALSO PLAYED IT IN THE SENTENCING COURT ROOM. WHY? IT HAD NOTHING ON IT THAT HE WAS SENTENCING!!!!!!! HE VIOLATED THE ACCUSED CIVIL RIGHTS IN SAYING AFTER GUILTY VERDICT THAT HE WAS A SEVERE FLIGHT RISK. TO BAIL OUT TO GET HIS BUSINESS IN ORDER! MR. HAYNES WAS A 42 YEARS BUSINESS MAN, HONEST CITIZEN AND A LARGE AMOUNT TAX PAYER; THEREFORE, HOW IN THE WORLD WAS HE A FLIGHT RISK?
Allen Ray Haynes told the judge: "I DID NOT TOUCH ROSS. HE WANTED TO DO AN ILLEGAL ACT TO BEAT ME OUT OF MY MONEY; THEREFORE , THE ACT WAS NOT MONEY. HE WAS OBEDIENT AND CARRIED OUT THE ACT THAT HE WANTED. I JUST USED PROFANITY TO DESCRIBE HIS WRONGNESS THAT HE NEEDED TO CHANGE.'
Well, Judge, before the trial Ross signed an affidavit that he was not touched. Judge, you were told that factor. you knew that the prosecutors had no viable evidence on it of the charges and it was an UPPITY Black man and not White. I guess for friends, you would exploit him by playing it in court and at the sentencing. I wonder iuhe was not you honorable integrity ethical judge? Since the cell phone video (exculpatory evidef your friends had a sexual explosion. An UPPITY Black man allowing an illicit request from an early age jail or prison convict to gyrate for the bail bond fee but all the while cussing him out to let him know that type of illegal action (that can be if money is involved a leading process for prostitution) would not pay the bail bond fee and he would not beat a professional bail/enforcement agent out of his money owed.
APPEAL’ S COURT INJUSTICE-by court clerk- Anonymous
THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL USED HEARSAY/CONJECTURE -NOT PROVEN FACTS- AND HER OPINION DENIAL OF APPEAL (APPEAL COURT RECORDS) AGREED BY THE BOARD OF APPEAL. WHY? Because “hearsay” -by law- was barred after segregation! CONJECTURE IN ANY FORM RUINS A PERSON'S LIFE. The reason hearsay is barred FROM evidence is simple: one cannot cross examine the person who is making the statement since that PERSON is not in court OR A PERSON COULD LIE. The person in court or the document read is simply repeating what someone else said…and that someone else is not present for cross examination.
Real and Legal Facts of Law by Attorney Joe Clemons
What is an appeal? After being convicted, a defendant may appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court, claiming there was some legal error made during trial which affected the fairness of the trial. The Mississippi Supreme Court will keep the case or assign it to the Mississippi Court of Appeals. Some typical claims of error made by defendants include: • That the State did not present enough evidence to prove each element of the crime; • That there was a violation of the rules of jury selection; • That the lower court wrongfully allowed or did not allow certain evidence to be admitted; • That there was a flaw in the instructions of law given to the jury; or • That the prosecutor said something unfair during closing argument. The appeal is not a new trial, and the facts found during the trial which support the guilty verdict will apply to the Court’s decisions regarding the legal issues raised. The Court’s decision is based upon the contents of the record on appeal. No new evidence can be added.
ü Claiming there was some legal error made during trial which affected the fairness of the trial.
ü That the State did not present enough evidence to prove each element of the crime; • That there was a violation of the rules of jury selection; • That the lower court wrongfully allowed or did not allow certain evidence to be admitted; • That there was a flaw in the instructions of law given to the jury; or • That the prosecutor said something unfair during closing argument. The appeal is not a new trial, and the facts found during the trial which support the guilty verdict will apply to the Court’s decisions regarding the legal issues raised
1. Unfairness: The bail bondsman who prepares the bail bond gets to have custody of the defendant, A bail bondsman sells bail bonds, a kind of insurance policy that guarantees the court that the bailee will either show up for court sessions as directed, or else that the set bail amount will be paid to the court. Overall, the bail bondsman plays an essential role in the criminal justice system by providing a way for defendants to be released from jail. At the same time, they await trial while ensuring they appear for court appearances. Custody versus kidnapping: Thus, legally a professional bail bond/enforcement agent cannot be arrested for kidnapping when he legally get a person from jail! If -beyond a shadow of doubt-harm to the convict bailed out of jail; then, there are other legal charges.
2.**** Ineffective defense counsel allowed the charges and did not have any testimony from the State of Ms Bail Bond Association; NO testimony from the COLLECTION FINANCIAL LLC working under soliciting agent to collect bail bond fee-if not paid at jail, collateral, buy and sell items OR SHOWING THAT CIVIL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY IDENTIFYING THE ACCUSED OF HIS RIGHTS AS AN OWNER OF A BAIL BOND AGENCY AND LICENSED PROFESSIONAL BAIL BOND/ENFORCEMENT AGENT BUT IDENTIFIED AS A BOUNTY HUNTER.
***THE ACCUSED WAS NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY AND REQUESTED TO DO SO.
***THERE WERE NO WITNESSES FROM THE ACCUSED DOWNTOWN OFFICE, LLC COLLECTIONS OR THE BAIL BONDING ASSOCIATION IN JACKSON, MS.
***THERE WERE NO CHARACTER WITNESSES THE ACCUSED OR THE ACCUSER
***THERE WERE NO REBUTTAL WITNESSES
***THERE WERE NO DEFENSE ATTORNEY PROPER ADDRESS TO THE JURY MAKING IT VERY, VERY INEFFECTIVE.
****THERE WERE NO PICTURES SHOWN OF THE HOME OFFICE WHERE ALTERCATION TOOK PLACE. OR ISOLATED HAYNES-GRAY ROAD
****THERE WERE NO PRINT OUT OF THE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE SHOWING THAT THERE WAS NO TOUCHING THE ACCUSE.
+++++THERE WERE NO WITNESSES FACTUAL STATEMENTS OF THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE ACCUSER LEAVING THE ALTERCATION IN A HEALTHY CONDITION!
******MAGEE AND MY SON SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN TRIED TOGETHER. NO SEPARATION SUGGESTED BEFORE TRIAL.
3. HIT IN THE FACE WITH A GUN” SHOW NO SIGNS PERJURY TESTIMONY ACCEPTED BY JUDGE CLAYBOURNE MCDONALD. INEFFECTIVE DEFENSE ATTORNEY HAD NO REBUTTAL OR SHOW OF PERSON HIT IN FACE WITH A GUN.
4. EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE OF A CELL PHONE VIDEO THAT EXIBITED THE ENTIRE ALTERCATION THAT WAS USED BY JUDGE CLAYBOURNE MCDONALD AND TURNED INTO INCULPATORY EVIDENCE TO HAVE JURY SPECULATION AND IMPARTIALITY..
5. GYRATION IN ANY FORM FOR MONEY OR THE PERCEPTION OF MONEY IS A PROSTITUTION CRIME. BAIL BOND FEE WAS THE MAIN FACTOR OF THE ALERCATION BUT JUDGE CLAYBOURNE MCDONALD ALLOWED THE TESTIMONEY OF AN ACCUSER THAT HAD BEEN JAILED FROM EARLY AGE AND WELL KNOWN RUMORED TO BE -WHEN OUT OF JAIL-PANERER/PIMP PROSTITUTE-(TRAINED CON ARTIST) AND WAS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE ACCUSED BAIL BOND AGENCY THAT WAS THE SURETY FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT.
6. WHERE OH WHERE WAS THE FORENSICS, DNA, OR OTHER FACTUAL WITHOUT A DOUBT PROOF IN THE LOWER COURT? THAT WAS COMPLETELY OVERLOOKED FOR A HEARSAY DENIAL OF APPEAL?
7. INEFFECTIVE LOWER COURT COUNSEL ALLOWED CELL PHONE VIDEO TO BE PLAYED TO ENTIRE COURT ROOM AND APPEAL BOARD ALLOW IT TO BE FAIL AND LAWFUL TO PLAY IT IN THE SENTENCING COURT.THE VIDEO HAD A VERY ANGRY ACCUSED DEMANDING THE BAIL BOND FEE WITH PROFANITY.
8. THE ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GERNERAL DID NOT EXHIBIT THAT Everything related to the law follows a set of rules and regulations for a process to be completed in favor of the law.